In our media saturated culture, not a day goes by, it seems, that arguments pushing for gun control aren’t shoved down our collective throats.
And let’s be honest, when those “arguments” are reviewed, they’re bad. Really bad.
But being terrible arguments doesn’t stop ideologically driven politicians and media talking heads and activist judges from using them to try to steal your Second Amendment rights.
It’s evil.
Fortunately, though, there are at least a few judges out there who not only care about upholding the Constitution (instead of neutering it) but also understand firearms.
One judge in particular that I recently came across is very knowledgeable about guns, and he’s in possibly the last court that I would have expected, a court that has been consistently left-leaning for a number of years now: the 9th Circuit Court!
I would have never expected that, but this judge, Lawrence VanDyke, knows his information, and once you see what he had to say about a recent majority ruling by the court (which he dissented from), you’ll agree with me.
You can watch his video about this ruling below.
Did you watch the video?
Judge VanDyke is obviously a competitive shooter himself and can quickly and easily take down a pistol as well as reassemble it. Not only that, he’s incredibly knowledgeable about how the different components of a firearm both work and work together.
Couple that knowledge with the ability to logically reason how the law should be applied when literally every component is necessary for the functioning of the firearm, and Judge VanDyke’s video completely demolishes gun control arguments like magazine capacity limitations.
He took a wrecking ball to anti-2A activists’ “reasoning” for magazine capacity limitations.
Now what California (and the rest of the country) needs to do is to only allow into judicial office people like Judge VanDyke who care about the law and about intelligent, rational application of the law in the real world… As opposed to the knee-jerk emotional activist judges that are too often put there.
