Anti-Gunner Logic: Call Losing Winning?

3
1257

Anti-gunners aren’t known (at least among those who know history and statistics in context) as being logical people. They aren’t know for having sound reasoning on their side. And, a recent article in The Washington Post makes that clear (again) for those with eyes to see.

The headline of the Post story read: “Gun-control advocates pushed back a tough year at the state level, and they’ll take the win.” On first glance, it would seem that anti-gunners are doing well on the state level. Certainly, they have been trying hard this year, even pushing legislation in traditionally pro-gun areas like the South. But, when you dig deeper into the article and actually do some thinking about what it says and the source which it comes from, the truth shows something different. Chris Cox writes about the article,

The story’s byline is from a reporter whose biography says she “writes about politics.” The content, however, is derived from a “report” by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence (LCPGV), a group of gun-hating lawyers now formally associated with Americans for Responsible Solutions (ARS), the gun ban group led by Gabby Giffords and her husband, Mark Kelly.

The basic premise of the Post article is that gun control is “winning” because it’s not losing as badly as it conceivably could.

When the reality of the situation is looked at closer, the situation looks even worse for anti-gunners. Cox continues,

In reality, however, “winning” for the gun control side was nothing of the sort. Even with many legislatures still in session and numerous pro-gun initiatives on the move, the NRA has landed all of the year’s significant wins to date, and the opportunities that were missed this year will be revisited until success is achieved in coming legislative sessions.

The Post article glosses over the fact that the ratio of pro to anti-gun bills actually signed into law at press time was 20:1. Only in the modern era of fake news running amok would that ratio result in the clear loser proclaiming victory and the media reporting it as true.

Cox goes on to clarify that the “victories” claimed by anti-gunners are things like passing legislation to fund gun control activity that had already been made into law in those areas. In other words, anti-gunners are celebrating “Hey, we funded what was already a law” while conveniently ignoring huge wins by pro-gun lobby groups.

That’s not exactly what I would call logic. That’s what I would call political spinning if not outright lying.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Even if they took every gun from law abiding citizens it would not stop any of this, as anyone with any common sense at all knows criminal do not play by the rules. Look at Chicago, some of the toughest gun control laws around and yet the highest murder and gun violence in the world. I might consider their argument if they themselves give up their armed security for them and their families but these hipocrites feel that they are better than everyone else and that they alone should have a way to protect themselves and their loved ones. They are pathetic, liars and blinded by the P.C. mentality, you show me a person who thinks taking peoples guns will stop crime or violence and I will show you a moron.

  2. These people are almost 100% democRATS. It has always been their practice to commit a crime, point at it, and loudly accuse somebody else.
    They love giving terribly bad legislation great and grandiose names. Like The “Affordable” Care Act. “AFFORDBLE” ??? The price of this boondoggle for people with children, that need it, has already quadrupled and is going up from there.
    So when they claim a win, be careful not to step in the blood.
    They are great at awarding themselves participation trophys !

  3. Antigun advocates are just frightened people who ignore logic and don’t know the truth. They are sheep being led by the demo fake news. TRUTH HURTS. Illegal wepons will still flourish in the U.S..

Comments are closed.