NY Court Still Trying To Go After NRA Even Though They Are Leaving NY

5
554

Anti-gunners are like bratty little children.

No, really.

Anti-gunners, like little brats (like leftists in general, it would seem), aren’t simply satisfied with getting their way. They aren’t satisfied with getting you away from them. No, they want to punish you if you disagree with them. They want you to agree with them or to be destroyed.

Advertisement

It’s like they have some emotionally shallow need for you to agree with them or to not exist because, maybe, they might be wrong (gasp!) if everyone doesn’t validate their silly little tantrum.

And we have a perfect example of this out of the State of New York (hat tip to here for the lead). Erin Durkin writes,

State Attorney General Tish James’ lawsuit seeking to dissolve the National Rifle Association can move forward, a state judge ruled Thursday.

Judge Joel Cohen denied the NRA’s motions to dismiss the case, pause it or transfer it to a different court.

The attorney general filed the suit in state court in August, seeking to put the NRA out of business, charging that its leaders misused funds and engaged in self-dealing.

The NRA argued that the case should be tossed because it belongs in federal, not state court, and that it should be heard in Albany instead of Manhattan.

The judge rejected all of those requests.

Durkin continues,

State law gives the attorney general oversight over nonprofits registered in New York, including the ability to bring a suit to dissolve a not-for-profit corporation. The suit argues that the NRA should be dissolved because it has shown a pattern of conducting its business in a persistently fraudulent or illegal manner, violating its tax-exempt status. It says the NRA has diverted millions of dollars away from its charitable mission, in violation of laws governing nonprofits.

Whether the State of New York had a valid suit for any reason, once the NRA completes their bankruptcy filing in New York and moves to Texas (see here for more information on that), it would seem logical that this would be out of the legal jurisdiction of the New York AG since the NRA wouldn’t be legally located there. Then again, I’m not a lawyer, and many of the legal rulings that I’ve seen in the past several months seem to care little for legalities and seem to care a great deal about politics.

So, I guess we’ll see what happens, but this just strikes me as another example of an anti-gunner in government seeking to force a group to agree with them, and, when unable to accomplish that, seeking to destroy that group. It’s petty and pathetic.

Advertisement

5 COMMENTS

  1. SO TO SPEAK
    ITS NOT THE 2ND AMENDMENT
    ITS ABOUT THE DEM SCUM MESSING WITH ANY PART OF OUR PRICELESS CONSTITUTION AT ALL. EVER.

    DEM SCUM? BETTER THROW IN A FEW SLIME FROM THE RUPUB GROUP AS WELL. ROMNEY, PAUL ETC.

    ITS A SIMPLE MATTER. WE PROVED THAT, OBVIOUSLY, WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP. WE VOTE FOR ONLY THOSE WHO SPEAK OUR LANGUAGE TO THE DOT OF THE i. WE PAY ATTENTION – DAILY. WE SEE TO IT THAT OUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS GET OFF THEIR BUTTS AND JOIN US OR LEAVE US. WE FULLY SUPPORT THOSE POLITICAL FOLKS FIGHTING SCUM SUCKERS LIKE BIDEN, SANDERS, PELOSI, HARRIS, OBAMA ETC.

    IF YOU NEED A NEW PRESIDENT I THINK TRUMP IS STILL AVAILABLE : )

  2. When are you gonna start drivin tax payin businesses outta the state, when you cant afford to operate it any more!? Think you have enough problems right now, and you cant blame em on Trump!!!

  3. Agree whole heartedly! This bunch of commie idiots(obama, all the bidens, pelisi and her cousins and all the ignorant arrogant twits on the dem side (and the rino pukes) need to wake up and smell the coffee. Do not mess with the constitutional rights of American citizens. Mind your OWN business and dont try to change what you dont understand. Maybe you should have listened better in History and civics…

  4. It continues to boggle my mind at what of, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” these people have so much difficulty in understanding.

  5. The problem these Anti-Gunners have is that they do not want a Militia in the United States. An armed public will not allow THUGS to take over without a fight. This is what was done in Germany. Disarm the public for the safety of the people and then the “jack boots” have total rule, since they are the only ones with guns. Ask the Jewish population of Germany how safe they were once their guns were taken. I believe that no one reads history anymore, but instead changes it to fit the narrative they are trying to sell. It is a sad day in the Banana Republic of America.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.