Sometimes you wish people in government were smarter than they are. For example, while some states are doing the right thing by seeking to nullify any Federal restrictions on the Second Amendment, other states are not so smart and are doing just the opposite by trying to actually ban the Second Amendment.
It sounds crazy, but it’s actually true. Carey Wedler gives us the scary details:
Legislators in Hawaii, which has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the United States, moved this week to bring their concerns about the Second Amendment to the national level.
In Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) No, 42, introduced Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers assert that “in light of the numerous tragic mass shootings at schools, work places, and public events, this body believes that it is necessary to repeal or amend the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
In the resolution, lawmakers urge Congress to “adopt a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution pursuant to article V of the United States Constitution to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms.”
The sponsors of the resolution suggest the Framers’ use of the term “well-regulated militia” was “intended only to restrict the United States Congress from legislating away a state’s right to self-defense.”
Hawaii has a history of enacting gun control. In 2016, Hawaii became the first state in the country to add gun owners in the state to the FBI’s centralized database (known as “Rap Back”), which allows federal authorities to notify local law enforcement when a gun owner is arrested. That bill, SB 2954, was co-sponsored by Sen. Roz Baker, who also introduced this week’s resolution.
Resolution co-sponsor Stanley Chang has a similar history of advocating gun control measures, while other legislators who introduced SCR No.42, like Sen. Laura Thielsen and Sen. Karl Rhoads, have likewise supported other anti-Second Amendment policies.
It doesn’t take a genius to understand that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to allow individual citizens to defend themselves (often from their governments), but it does take someone with an agenda and without intellectual honesty to try to interpret it in another manner.
The people of Hawaii had better try harder to prevent their government from taking away their rights or they will wake up one day with all of them gone. And they will have no one to blame but themselves.
In the 20th century 56 million defenseless people died by the hands of their governments who had passed gun control. When the government took over control of the country the government gathered up dissidents, religious people, and people who could not work to support the new government. The Globalists feel the earth is too crowed. The belief that full term babies can be killed? That people with disabilities and the elderly cannot function to support the government can be rounded up and be eliminated? We need to be aware of what can actually happen when a government runs amok.
You are right on! America needs to wake up before it’s too late.
Well said, sir….and the sole reason the left is after it is to do the same and the minions are too stupid to understand that.
Closer to 100 million paid the price of a tyrannical government and no way to fight back.
THAT is why the “students” of today are INDOCTRINATED from nursery school to college to make sure they “graduate” as completely BRAINWASHED “controllable” COMMUNISTS. All one has to do is open their eyes and see who is being “voted in” in congress by CLUELESS “millenials” and corrupt DEMOCOMMUNISTS intent on turning our REPUBLIC into a third-world CRAP-HOLE.
Don’t forget the 30 million that Stalin murdered before WWII. They also were disarmed first.
Be worried…be afraid. Socialism is coming and and obamanations NWO will be a reality. The American public is being brainwashed and the illegal vote will prevail this time around. The left lost in 2016…they will NOT lose in 2020. Why do you think they are fighting tooth and nail to prevent Trump building the wall???
FredK….Our Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd A to prevent a tyrranical gov.
You are INDEED CORRECT!
THAT WAS “THE” reason for the 2nd to be added in the first place. and THAT is why CORRUPT DEMOCOMMUNISTS want it GONE.
“THEY” know an ARMED LAW-ABIDING POPULATION cannot be easily CONTROLLED or “ELIMINATED” if they see fit to do so.
Some “anti’s” are trying to use the words “Well regulated militia” to limit the right to “organized militias” when – in fact – that wording is a Preamble to support our 2A rights and could and probably should have been omitted. The actual meat of the Amendment is, “The right of the People shall not be infringed.” In fact, “militia” very likely had a different meaning then.
What you want to read is “The Unabridged Second Amendment” by J. Neil Schulman
This article is the definition and parsing of the Second Amendment by an unimpeachable authority on the English language in the person of Roy Copperud, a retired professor of journalism at the University of Southern California and the author of American Usage and Style: The Consensus.
Disarming the people will be one of the first things the socialist democrat will do in 2020. In order to do the rest of their agenda they must be sure we cannot defend ourselves. Then cell phone…they cannot allow people to communicate with each other..then they will control the internet and television. The schools are already filling kids heads with BS propaganda. They now are indoctrination centers…gone are the days of ‘readin’, writin’, and ‘rithmetic.
Well said wish we could teach that to them early it truly would save 🇺🇸From these dum ass kids they have no idea how could they have it
Indeed it was done for that very reason yet the minions are too stupid to understand it.
These Hawaiin law peddlers took the same oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America 🇺🇸. Protect, defend. All that..
All law peddlers do the same. Some take that oath seriously, and try to do their best to uphold our Constitution.
Others, like these law peddlers never gave that oath a moment’s thought.
Its a lot like marriage vows. Many do.
Some do not.
Now, Missouri is doing a really cool thing. They are using their 10th Amendment rights to wrap protectively around the 2nd Amendment. They nullify any federal law restricting firearms or ammunition. They reassert their state’s rights. They take back any and all authority the feds have imposed upon the state. Anyone attempting to impose any federal firearms law in the state is guilty of a felony.
Now THERE are some TEETH!
Our president talks a lot about supporting 2A, and I like him a lot. But, he’s not supported us one bit.
Red-flag laws sweeping the country. Unconstitutional. Bumpstock confiscation with ten year prison sentence. That was HIS idea! He told DOJ/BATF to draft it. The BATF cannot make laws! The president cannot make laws!
By now we should have CCW reciprosity in every state. At least those that are not Constitutional Carry.
I don’t know why he’s letting the law peddlers chip away at 2A.
they should arrest these a-holes for crimes against the government – I can’t figure out how anyone can vote for these radical leftwing nut jobs
Not crimes against the government but crimes against the people…Let us not forget that we the people are governed by our own consent.
You can no longer vote in 🇺🇸 U will see it even more clear in 2020
I have the same exact question about what Trump does and doesn’t do. People talk about how aggressive he is about some things…I find him passive about the very things we elected him to work on. I am especially disappointed in his reaction to the actual facts of the damage guns do and the fact that we may not have a 2nd Amendment if this activity by the globalists continues.
We have far too many people who believe the agenda of the Globalists. The following group: Soros, those 15 billionaires who own our media, the ultra rich of the USA most other countries and a Congress in control of the Dems who are actually socialists/or communists/or na’er do wells and miscreants of one kind or another (but most certainly Globalists) are going to be the death of our Constitution and its Amendments.
Maybe Trump came too late to the President’s office. The Dems seem to be in control and have been in control since Trump was elected (which is why he can’t clean the Swamp or follow his stated agenda.). and we seem to be much too considerate of their differences from conservatives.
I do not anticipate a good ending to all of this. We have people in government and in the MSM clearly stating their seditionist agenda without any repercussions. We have a sub-culture of Omamists controlling virtually all the minor positions in government and Trump can’t get rid of them because of the laws also imposed by Obama.
Where were we during that time? We, being believers of the “good of mankind” were duped by the mainstream media and our elected officials who have been secretly on the Globalist agenda since maybe Nixon.
Everything I have read about the outcome of socialism in other countries is grim and has almost always led to the deaths of millions of people. Venezuela is the most visible current country in such a situation.
Basically, I think conservatives are literal, deductive thinkers for the most lpart and liberals are emotional, emotive, inductive thinkers–I haven’t read the works of one who is not. Logic and logical thinkings missed them by a long shot. Now we will suffer and suffer and suffer as we lose more and more of our beautiful protections of our Constitution and Amendments and logical thinking will die with us.
Geez the connection between what I wrote is that every country that went socialist began the process by confiscating guns. That is the crux of the issue.
I saw your after thought to your original post but understand this! It is NOT the guns that are a problem when one is used for an atrocity like a illegitimate shooting of ANY type…it is the person who was holding the gun at the moment he/she pulls the trigger…the sick person behind the gun and until we address that most SERIOUS issue, bad people will kill, no matter the method! You and others need to understand that to start with! As for where were we when the Dems were taking control??? You were probably listening and watching garbage like CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR; all of the avowed America haters who dress up like Reporters but are nothing like REAL reporters – complete and total dishonest idiots. THAT IS MOST LIKELY WHERE YOU AND OTHERS LIKE YOU WERE GETTING YOUR “NEWS” FROM! I, for one, listen to them for a brief moment only to see if they are still off in the weeds, as usual, they are. I listen to Conservative shows and I would advise you to do the same to answer your questions – where were we. We have been screaming from the rooftops of the trouble and problems brewing but our microphone has not been loud enough, in an organized fashion, in conjunction with the Left’s mainstream media idiot Parrots!
I think pres trump came at right time an I have faith in every gun owner to stand with him when they try any take over of there guns an are freedom don’t underestimate the flag flying people know what we have we are a super power of good people an will fight for 🇺🇸 We the people pay attention what’s going on
The Demoncrats want to punish decent, honest citizens for the actions of the criminals and crazies that are allowed to run loose in modern America! Lock up the criminals and crazies, problem solved!
Why lock them up?? If “they” are GUILTY”, EXECUTE THEM so we TAXPAYERS do not have to pay for “three hots and a cot, color TV, and gourmet food. (they eat better than many of US do) I am friends with a person that runs the kitchen in a prison up here in COMMUNIST N.Y. and he told me what they HAVE to serve the inmates to keep them “healthy”.
How about repealing Hawaii.. move ALL federal facilities to more friendly locations..
Right, we got along fine with just 49 states!
We got along fine with just 48 states to !!!
California is going that way to …
Ship some of the Immigrants at the border to Hawaii. I have heard that it is a “Sanctuary Island”.
Send them boat loads turn them red in a day after two boats off load 😂
Heroni is one of the least intelligent people in the US Govt. How much lying does a person of such low IQ need to do to get elected.? I imagine “Just enough”.
Remember Pearl Harbor,it wasn’t Japan’s first choice, it was the West Coast but Yamamoto said we will not meet our objectives because behind every blade of grass there is a”GUN”, thanks to the 2nd amendment we are still speaking ENGLISH.
I always thought that Congress was supposed to uphold and defend our Constitution not change it
As a retired Law Enforcement Officer, you should not be surprised
that I uphold the 2nd., with NO QUESTIONS ASKED! It is time
we re-consider the election of any person who would not even, REMOTELY
consider this matter. Tim,e to CLEAN HOUSE!
The man in the Whitehouse does not care one bit about you or I. He wants to be a dictator why do you think so many cabinet members have been fired or left. He will cut away at our 2A rights as well as any others he can if it benefits he or his friends. We all need to worry.
If YOU think Trump is that man…YOU, sir, are one sick puppy! The Dems are
ALL OVER THE PLACE with their hatred of the 2nd Amendment, WHAT PART OF THEIR RHETORIC HAVE YOU NOT HEARD, IN JUST THE LAST 24 HOURS ALONE, never mind every day of every year for the last 50 years!
You ARE right about one thing, we ALL do need to worry…but about the correct crap to worry about! Trump’s actions speak louder than his words, thank the good Lord for THAT since I have NEVER agreed with the way a New Yorker speaks to and about anything! BUT, HIS ACTIONS SPEAK VOLUMES FOR WHAT HE THINKS ABOUT THIS COUNTRY AND IT’S CITIZENS IN MIDDLE AMERICA! You could take some lessons from that!
Way wrong he is cutting people who don’t do there job the job of protecting 🇺🇸S an fools like u
They would have a hard time taking my guns now they are trying to get in to my business, it’s not going to happen I have the right to defend myself and you can bet everyone else feels the same just let them try taking our guns and they will have a army of guns turn on them who do they think they are nobody is going to run my life but me and tell me what I have to do so they can kiss my Royal.
I LOVE YOU!!
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the rightof the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The 2Amendment does not say:
Or any other like choice of words.
It clearly states:
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
1) actively break the terms of (a law or agreement)
2) act so as to limit or undermine (something), encroach on.
Undermine,erode, diminish, weaken, impaire, damage, compromise, limit, curb, check, disturb, disrupt.
OK, WHAT PART OF THIS IS NOT
CLEAR AS PURE WATER IN A CRYSTAL WINE GLASS.
Anyone politician who speaks of gun taking or violence should NEVER NEVER hold any office
As a student of the constitution, the truth behind all of it were deemed necessary by the writers of the constitution. We need to keep that knowledge in mind before we destroy the constitution.
The Constitution is a shield not a sword
This will never happen without starting a civil war and it is one that no Democrat or Republican can win for the second Amendment is a given right to the citizens to protect their families and to stop a tyrannical take over of the country and these politicians better wake up to that fact, and we already know that the Democratic party is after taking over our country and it is the citizen voters that have let all this division come to light for if the voters had put term limits on these politicians and really took the time to look into these politicians that are running they would find much more about them!!! For we the citizens should be looking at are these politicians 100% constitutional and do they uphold are laws and do they uphold are constitution as written of which we can find out very easy just by looking up their voting on bills and policies!!!! We already know that the Democratic party is one that we must get rid of for they have shown that they are radicals and that they will lie and sell our country out just to take full control of our lives for open borders, killing babies after birth and even up to the third term is nothing but murder and just insane!!!! The Democrats just are not the party that they once were and the citizens need to wake up to that fact for they attack are religions, they attack are constitution and are common sense laws, and are rights to free speech and are the party that divide us all with their attacks of white privilege comments for causing division is their model and what they want, and if we continue to allow these evil people to stay in are government we will never come together as one nation to prosper and be free!!!! These Democrats tell us it is the immigrants that built this country and they are right, but back then we had strict laws and they were upheld and these immigrants didn’t come here to get feed, housed, and to be taken care of for the rest of their lives they came here to have freedom and the liberty and rights to choose their way of life and the religion that they wish to worship, and the right to vote for these immigrants came from many countries to get away from tyrannical run governments!!! They did not come here with hands out saying give me give me they came here to build their own lives and came with great skills and a pride in the work that they did, and the majority of them were very hard workers not freeloaders and that is something the Democrats have taken away from are citizens for the Democrats think they can bribe us and by are freedoms and rights and it is plane to see this if we all would just open your minds!!!!
The Supreme Court has said there will not be term limits. Makes me wonder how they put term limits on the president? “the U.S. Supreme Court declared the practice unconstitutional with its decision in the case of U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton.”
Awesome, I wish somebody could make a list for voting record a list of traitors
“Civil wae happens when the victomized are armed.
Genocide happens when they are not.”
A. E. Samann
In addition, WE need to be vigilant and willing to march on Washington or ANY State Capital, for that matter, when they start passing these insane laws because they KNOW that only UNLAWFUL people will have guns when they take LAW-ABIDING owners guns away; and, ONLY so they can do ANYTHING they want to us after our guns are taken away! I’ve been saying since Obama’s 2nd yr in office that the Dems were pushing for a 2nd American Revolution, and it has only gotten worse, now that the Dems think their time has come to railroad us all into cattle cars and destroy this Country once and for all time, if they get their way, that is! Nobody wants to believe that any of this will come to a march on Washington, but what the Dems are doing is just plain Treasonous, I’ve been saying it for a long time, and Trump said it yesterday, FINALLY! Anyone found to undermine the Constitution of these United States has committed an Act of Treason, look up the definition, if no one believes what I am saying herein. The one-line in the middle of the Declaration of Independence states, to paraphrase a little: it is REQUIRED that all Good Men take back the Country when the it is under assault. Said enough this go round. But now that the Dems believe it is their time and that they have the general population on their side because they have been selling the lies and deceit for 50 years and think that most of finally bought into it since they feel they have successfully moved the minds of enough people into their camp just watch what they do next! Be prepared and if not yet, do so SOON!
Great advice at the end U 🇺🇸
Guess these STATES that are trying to change the 2nd amendment don’t really know the CONSTITUTION AND LAWS GOVERENING the process to do this! IT takes 38 states to change any part of the CONSTITUTION and no state alone can do it!
It all boils down to which party is in charge of the state, the Tyrants or the Constitutionals …
A person can’t support the 2nd Amendment and limit the type arms it guarantees or the amount of arms …
What is really at issue with Hawaii’s position is their interpretation of the “well regulated militia” clause as applying only to each State’s governing body and not the citizens therein. The intent of the writers of the Constitution, and specifically the Bill Of Rights is to guarantee the body of the citizenry of each separate State that their individual Rights of “Life, Liberty and Happiness” would be assured for each and every individual. This recognition was necessary to assure agreement to the formation of the United States of America. As opposed to the correct interpretation, this State of Hawaii, and others, are attempting to centralize and assert new controls under a semi sovereign governing body not legally established and as separate from the United States to which they actually owe allegiance for all things Constitutional. The State’s only legal powers lie in those powers not assigned in the Constitution which do not include restraints on the Rights of the Citizenry.
The Legislature, history, culture and heritage of the Hawaiian Islands is heavily influenced by Japanese culture, which, while very traditional and honorable, does not, repeat not, tend toward any social or legal structure that defends individual rights. This is evidenced by this sort of action by the Hawaiian State against the US Constitution but also repeatedly by the Senators they have sent to Washington.
To omega two it takes also an article 5 convention it cannot be done in an act of Congress unless it is done under those circumstances otherwise no changes are made and they are not valid and cannot be made valid by a vote and that is less is it a vote of every citizen of the United States
If the government can erase the rules that regular the government where does it stop? If I get caught speeding I guess I can amend the speed limit to suit me. My taxes are 5 times what they were when I bought my house and my kids are adults. Can I amend the tax code so I have paid it for 40 years, and think they should only be allowed to collect school and property taxes for 20 years. That more than covers the expense of my kids schooling and my house is paid off. I don’t think I should be made to pay taxes on it anymore. The government has literally been taking the homes of retired people who worked hard and paid taxes all along. Enough is enough! So if the government can change the laws it is regulated by, I think people should be able to amend our insane tax laws. By the people, For the People!
If the power-seekers are allowed to get rid of the 2nd Amendment, how long before they get rid of the rest of the Bill of Rights? Besides, the dependent clause in a sentence can attempt to explain the reasoning behind the main or independent clause, but it cannot alter its meaning. The independent clause in the 2nd Amendment says that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” No ambiguity there! As Jefferson said, we must remain eternally vigilant against any attempt to limit or violate our rights and freedoms! History teaches us that an armed populace cannot be put under tyranny. That is the primary reason for the 2nd Amendment which is an integral part of our Constitution. Anyone’s “feelings” to the contrary are irrelevant!
I would go to committee meeting and tell those if you repeal parts of OUR Constitution it WILL BE 1776 all over again, YOU (committee members) WILL be arrested and tried for treason and HANGED with EXTREME prejudice
Funny. Here’s the last place in the world to ratify our Constitution and become a state and now it’s not good enough for them. You become a state by accepting the Constitution, you don’t become a state and then seek to change it.
Robert Greenslade has something say on the subject:
“All gun rules, regulations, policies and laws are unconstitutional and MUST be removed! Regarding the governments ability to impose “Reasonable Restraint” which has now become the mantra of our liberal influenced government.
Supporters of the bill of rights claim they have a constitutional or Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Opponents counter even if it were the case, the government was granted the general power to place restraints on the right. Both of these assertions are based on a misconception concerning the intent of the document known as the Bill of Rights.
When the Bill of Rights was submitted to the individual States for ratification, it was prefaced with a preamble. As stated in the preamble, the purpose of the Amendments was to prevent the government from “misconstruing or abusing its powers.” To accomplish this, “further declaratory and restrictive clauses” were being recommended. The Amendments, when adopted, did not create any so-called constitutional rights or grant the government any power over individual rights; they placed additional restraints and qualifications on the powers of the government concerning the rights enumerated in the Amendments.
By advancing the myth Amendments grant the American people their individual rights, the government has illegally converted enumerated restraints and qualifications on its power into legislative, executive, judicial and administrative power over individual rights. The government claims it was granted the constitutional authority to determine the extent of the individual rights enumerated in the Amendments and/or impose “reasonable restraints” on those rights. This assertion is absurd. The government does not have the constitutional authority to ignore, circumvent, modify, negate or remove constitutional restraints placed on its power by the Amendments or convert them into a power over the individual right enumerated in the particular restraint.
A denial of power or an enumerated restraint on the exercise of power is not subject to interpretation or modification by the entity the restraint is being imposed upon. The restraints imposed by the Amendments, which were adopted 4 years after the Constitution was ratified, override the legislative, executive, judicial or administrative powers of the government. If this were not the case, then the restraints would be meaningless because the government could simply circumvent, modify or remove them. Why would the States have requested and adopted enumerated restraints on government power, subsequent to their ratification of the Constitution, if the government possessed the authority to nullify them?
When the government infringes on one of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights it is not violating anyone’s constitutional rights; it is violating the additional restraint or qualification placed on its power by the particular Amendment where the right is enumerated. The distinction between rights and restraints is critical. [The right is not given by the Government. Our rights are given by God and are inalienable. Therefore, they can’t be limited or taken away.]
As stated in the Declaration of Independence, the American people have unalienable rights that come from a higher source than government or a written document. By acknowledging people have natural rights, which are bestowed by a creator, the Founders laid the foundation for the principle the government does not have the lawful authority to take away or infringe on those rights. This principle was incorporated into the preamble and structure of the Amendments to secure individual rights from government encroachment; that is why they were designed and imposed as restraints on the exercise of power.
If the individual rights of the people had been created by the Constitution or an amendment to the document, then they would cease to be unalienable because the right would depend on the existence of a document. If the document or a provision of the document disappeared, so would the right. The belief individual rights were created by a written document has opened the door for the government to claim the power to define the extent of any right enumerated in an Amendment. This has transformed constitutional restraints placed on governmental power into subjective determinations of individual rights by the institutions of government. By failing to understand the difference between amendments that create rights and amendments that impose restraints on government, the American people are watching their individual rights vanish as they are reduced to the status of privileges bestowed by government because the constitutional restraints placed on governmental power are being replaced by government decree.
Opponents of the Amendments always try to diminish the right enumerated in the Amendments by asserting rights are not absolute. This is just another straw man argument because the Amendment is about imposing a restraint of the powers of the government concerning a right: not granting a right or defining the extent of a right. In addition, a review of the Second Amendment shows the restraint imposed by the Amendment does not contain any exceptions.”
Legal precedence supporting constitution and bill of rights.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”
Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.”
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262: “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.”
Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622: “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.”
Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 1974: Expounds upon Owen Byers v. U.S., 273 U.S. 28 Unlawful search and seizure. Your rights must be interpreted in favor of the citizen.
Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616: “The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured liberties.”
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436: “Where rights secured (Affirmed) by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.”
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425: “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486, 489: “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.”
Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748: “Waivers of Constitutional Rights, not only must they be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness.” “If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.” —Samuel Adams, 1772
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821): “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243: “We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905): “The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”
# RepealAllGunLaws #NoMoreGunControl #NoMoreGovernmentOverReach #DrainTheSwamp
Because our young have been dumbed down they know no history . America was and is the only free nation of free people on the entire planet . And our young are embracing Hitler and socialism at a rate that is beyond belief . We have stayed free because our enemies knew we would defend our family and country one American at a time or altogether . The globalists are paying our treasonous politicians to remove the only things that our constitution gives us to protect ourselves from the rogue government and our enemies. But as we all know we are not all living in the dark or braindead . So wake up . Get ready !
“To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.”
– Ted Nugent
My question is WHO elects these Communist Traitors and Why have they NOT been recalled. these are NOT the people we want in office and since they only want to change our Constitution they do NOT belong in office of any kind regarding the Laws of this Nation
“ From my cold dead fingers”
Starting to look like we should have let Japan have this treasonous state.
If Hawaii is worried about killings so much than they had better start at their own front doors with Planned Parenthood. Now you, elected people, who swore your oath to Protect The US Constitution over anything else had better do your duty to uphold your oath and stop attacking America people over their GOD Given Rights to protect themselves from a tyrannical government, by decree from the Bill Of Rights , like the one in Hawaii that’s going on as we speak.
What we are hearing out of Hawaii is words and acts of Treason…
Perhaps Hawaii prefers to give up statehood and return to being a protectorate! Since they seem to object to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights one must ask what do they really want! Do they really know or are the current legislators just obstinate or perhaps ignorant? Perhaps they can explain the psychological cause of individuals who decide to become criminals and also explain why criminals do not care what laws they pass!!!
Perhaps they don’t understand what the word “Criminal” means. Perhaps they wish to make everyone a criminal by passing laws that make honest law abiding citizens “Criminals”!!!!
Somewhere, logic and common sense have been lost in politics!
kick their sorry asses out of our union and let them fend for themselves . We don’t need those ignorant buttholes
Shall Not Be Infringed. If our law makers cannot understand these four words of the 2nd Amendment then they should not be law makers. Any law that infringes on the rights of the people to keep and bear arms is an unjust law and it’s not only the rights of the people to ignore such laws it is also their obligation. The 2nd Amendment was written with a purpose to insure that the people always had the right and the means to protect themselves from criminals but to also to protect themselves from a rogue Government that would attempt to remove the rights of the people to keep and bear arms. the 2nd Amendment with the Words Shall Not Be Infringed actually gives the people to defend themselves from that rogue Government without reprisal from that rogue Government. Our Constitution and Amendments are the laws of our Country and every law enacted should abide by it. If not then what is our Government for. By not following the rules and regulations written in our Constitution and Amendments our Government is violating the rights of every legal gun owner that are Citizens of the United States, and that my friend is against the law. Our own Government is breaking the very laws that they took an oath to protect and defend. Every member of our Government who is attacking the people’s right to keep and bear arms is breaking one of our laws and should be arrested and prosecuted as a criminal and a Traitor to the United States of America.
Comments are closed.