In a southern city recently, at a bank, a lone gunman (gunperson?) shot and killed several people in cold blood. Of course, as these deranged people often do, the shooter left a manifesto, and you may find it curious what was in it.
Before we get to that, though, to give some context to what we’re about to talk about, you should know that there is a type of political operation called a false flag (event). If you’re not familiar with the term, wikipedia defines it this way:
A false flag operation is an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party. The term “false flag” originated in the 16th century as an expression meaning an intentional misrepresentation of someone’s allegiance.
So, for example, the Nazi’s burning of the Reichstag (German legilature building) and blaming the arson on Jews was a false flag event that was done to give an excuse to harass and blame Jews.
Now, going back to the Louisville shooter, after you hear more about the shooter’s manifesto, you may begin to wonder if they committed those murders as a false flag event. Joseph Mackinnon writes,
It now appears that the pronoun-providing Louisville shooter may have ultimately spilled blood in part to help Democrats spill ink on gun control legislation.
A neighbor of the shooter told the New York Post that the apparent gun-control activist’s 13-page manifesto was discovered by his roommate Dallas Whelan. It is now in the possession of the Louisville Police Department.
The Daily Mail reported that the manifesto made three key points: “He wanted to kill himself, he wanted to prove how easy it was to buy a gun in Kentucky and he wanted to highlight a mental health crisis in America.”
If accurate, then Democrats may have made use of the slaughter of Josh Barrick, Deana Eckert, Tommy Elliott, Juliana Farmer, and Jim Tutt Jr. as their killer intended.
To be clear, because the shooter didn’t disguise who committed these shootings, the Louisville shooting can’t technically be called a false flag even, but it’s intent was the same: It was to paint a narrative blaming the incident on people who weren’t involved in the incident. In this case, the shooter (who is the only one to blame for the shooting) was trying to blame legal gun ownership and, by extension, legal gun owners for shootings in this country, even though it is people who illegally have firearms who commit most of those crimes.
So, no, that horrible shooting wasn’t a false flag event, but, like terrorism, it was done to push a narrative and to try to make innocent people look evil.
They are called “Useful Idiots”.
They are usually mentally unbalanced people who the left uses to commit henious crimes so the left can use their actions as a polical leveto promote their agenda, like GUN CONTROL.
Saul Alynski perfected and defined this. Read his “Rules for Radicals”.. Hillary Clinton and Obama were students of Alinsky.
Yes, given what is clearly known from its manifesto, the shooting was purposely staged. I don’t believe the school shooting was any different. Why else is the ‘government’ holding back on releasing her/hims diatribe.
I would point out that with most of the recent shootings, there’s no inconsequential evidence of “Grooming” going on. Many if the Shooters are known to the Authorities, in spite of the fact that Red Flag Laws, which are supposed to prevent such episodes, aren’t employed and have been available to Law Enforcement.
Though I’ve suspected this Grooming has been going on, the Uvalde Schiol Shooting convinced me it is not just a suspicion. There, an INCEL of limited means managed to purchase not one, but two Higher End ARs, more magazines than most AR owners possess and a significant quantity of Ammo (estimates based on what he had would be somewhere between $5,000 to $7,000). We’re supposed to believe he managed these purchases working 2 days a week forc2 to 3 years at a part time job? Pull the other one. As far as I’m concerned, someone helped the Shooter financially, to make his purchases.
INCELs, Gender Benders, and LGBTs have been involved in the last 6 or 6 true mass shootings (I don’t count Gang violence as Mass Shootings).
Basically, these people are lacking the basic normal ideas of being able to live society and wish for a change through violence. Unfortunately there is little or no way of combating this unless there is a change in the education and learning of values of living in society. Violence is looked on, in the media and entertainment industry as a prerequisite to monetary success. There is still, other causes, such as the possible political gain through using violence as a way to make your ideals come true.
If mass shootings appear every time government wants to move to the next stage of public disarmament then govt is behind the mass shootings.
That is how they did it in the UK, Australia and NZ and now the ruling class predator psychopaths are somehow creating these shootings to push their antigun agenda for their new world order, a utopia where they rule over the rest of us with an iron fist.
Comments are closed.