Liberal Magazine Shows Which Presidents Had More Mass Shootings

25
4892

There is an old saying that even a watched clock is right twice a day. In this same way, anti-gunner media can actually tell the truth about guns sometimes. This happens to be one of those rare cases.

Mother Jones magazine is about as politically liberal on every position that you can imagine. Whether it is environmentalism, race relations, or economics, Mother Jones is going to take the stereotypical position, and gun control is no exception.

But, if they make any attempt at being honest, even anti-gunners can’t completely hide the truth. A Redit user going by JCvynn reviewed the data from Mother Jones about mass shootings (which is available here) and came to this shocking conclusion:

More mass shootings occurred during the Obama administration than during the Bush, Jr., GHW Bush, Reagan, and Trump administrations combined. Additionally, the number of mass shootings which occurred during Bill Clinton’s administration was more than any of the Republican administrations, too. (hat tip to here for the source)

So, to be clear, mass shootings as compiled by an anti-gun magazine, show that mass shootings are higher during administrations that tend to be anti-gun based on political position.

Now, this isn’t a surprise to you or me. After all, we read sites like this and keep up with the way the world really works, not how the anti-gun mass media would like everyone to believe that the world really works. So, we know that carrying firearms, that hand gun usage, saves lives.

The truth may hurt them (albeit only emotionally), but don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. If we want real security and safety in America, what we need is a population who understands, respects, owns, and trains with their firearms, not a bunch of people who are too afraid of a tool to see it’s implications for good.

Gun control simply doesn’t save lives. Gun control kills.

25 COMMENTS

  1. I wonder why that is? Interesting that the worst race riots in our lifetimes occured during the tenures of far leftist radical democrat presidents:
    — LBJ: Watts (1965); Newark, Detroit (1967)
    — Clinton: Los Angeles (1992)
    — Obama: Ferguson (2014); Baltimore (2015)
    WHY??

    • Simple really.
      Progressive Democrats have always ignored violent racists that support their government run Progressive Plantations.

    • Because lawless rioters know they can get away with destruction and chaos and will get paid handsomely for their ‘work’!

    • An idiot? Perhaps, but one who was groomed to become Destroyer-in-Chief of the United States since childhood.

      • Because lawless rioters know they can get away with destruction and chaos and will get paid handsomely for their ‘work’!

  2. The explanation is simple. Attutude. Conservative presidents make the nation more inclined to be civil and respectful. Democrats and liberals tend to stir up the crazies.

  3. Just like every other liberal, too stupid to recognize it’s own knuckle headed policies are the problem while it heaps praise on it’s graven images.
    It doesn’t surprise me that this rag is popular among the left. It does amaze me that the facts are beyond the grasp of so many.
    Although I have read that a surprising number of snowflakes have been buying guns . . . supposedly to protect themselves from conservatives, Republicans and law biding American citizens.

    • Well, realization has to begin somewhere. Some of them will save themselves from actual bad guys, and some of those will pass the useful information along to other unenlightened liberals.

  4. I believe the reason is under the democrats they tend to not enforce the laws. Under xpresident Obama this
    same problem was even worse.
    With laws being broken the people start to panic, get angered and start these viglelanty groups to take the laws in their hands. The problem is with mayors,governors,etc. don’t want to be blamed when some people start saying we are becoming a police state. So they tell the police to stand down. We need to get the local,state ,and federal
    police and AT’s working together,forget the BS on the left saying police state. Enforce all the laws. listen to President Trump and AT Sessions. thank you
    KING ARTHUR GOULET

  5. Because these Progressive Liberal Sycophants embolden the inner-city animals with their stupid talk of diversity and opportunities that “must” be afforded these Government Dependent Bottom Feeders. We have spent billions of dollars and years of program development to help these people but they will not, cannot take advantage of them in the proper way because they are a lost cause. They use this money and programs to just perpetuate their lazy-ass way of life… Almost sixty years of this BS and we still have inner-city chaos. Give it up!!!!!

  6. I guess what you are trying to do is get the people to accept the fact that the president is responsible for each shooting on his watch. Does this include all the wars we are fighting also, Is he also responsible for all our men that have died during his watch. So what you are really trying to imply is from the beginning of time, all Presidents are responsible for happenings during their watch. Just how much shit can each one of you liberals hold??????? To say you all are full of it is absolutely ridiculous, in comparison to all the Demon-crats and liberals that are claiming to be responsible citizens and also the Republicans (JOHN McCain) for instance. Would that satisfy an identification of two face persons?? If you cannot come up with something that contains a true meaning to blame Mr. Trump for; then you are surely wasting our time and money(YOUR WAGES) from our taxes.

  7. AS A SOCIOLOGIST I STUDY CHANGES IN SOCIETYS AND PATTERNS IN SOCIETY. WHEN PEOPLE FEAR AN ANTI-GUN NUT IS COMING INTO POWER GUN AND AMMO PRICES SURGE, AS DOES PURCHASES FOR THOSE ITEMS AND THERE ACCESSORIES. WHEN AN ANTI-GUN NUT IS IN POWER THAT FEAR TURNS INTO ACTIONS THAT ARE ON STEROIDS, WHEN COMPARED TO PREVIOUSLY. SHORTAGES ARE THUS THE RESULT AND A BOX OF 50 RDS OF .22 LR,THAT SHOULD SELL FOR LESS THAN A $1 STARTS SELLING FOR $28 FOR A BOX OF 40 RDS. ALSO, THE REJECTS OF SOCIETY FEEL EMPOWERED WHEN THE ANTI-GUN NUT IS IN POWER AND THEY ACT OUT WITH EXPONENTIAL INCREASES IN GUN, RACE, RAPE AND ALL OTHER FORMS OF VIOLENCE. THUS THE RIOTS AND MASS SHOOTINGS. ALSO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION SPIKES AND THAT LEADS TO INCREASED CRIME, HIGHER UNEMPLOYMENT AND DEPRESSED WAGES.

  8. Obama’s open borders and the Refugees that we’re not vetted will be a mess to clean up. Obama’s instructions were to send all illegals to sanctuary cities. They were not to book THEM. Sheriff Joe and most Law Enforcement were booking them. Border Patrol was booking then turn over to ICE, I didn’t book any Illegals or illegal criminals. They were bussed to Phoniex, then to Sanctuary cities. Is this why Brown wants CA as a sanctuary State. Brown better start cleaning up the SC, BP, LE, OCE, Homeland security doing GREAT JOB. It cost MONEY to support Refugees and illegals, criminals in jail. TRUMP has a mess to clean up after Clinton’s and Obama’s. Lots of FRAUD with all of the agencies. God Help Our COUNTRY and TRUMP.

  9. I still can’t get over the fact, that they wanted to put

    I still can’t get over the fact, that they wanted to put Sherrif Arbaio in jail. He was enforcing the immigration law. It was actually Obama who was the law-breaker. He was the most lawless president in this Nation’s history. And on top of that, he hates the United States and its constution.

    • Amen to That! Did he think he was fooling anyone other than himself and the non-thinking ‘democrat ‘liberals’ ie: communists.

  10. I still can not get over the fact, that they wanted to put Sherrit Arpaio in jal for enforcing our immigration laws. I was Obama that should put to jail for not enforcing excisting immigration laws.

  11. If you would look into it, you’ll find that almost every mass shooting was done by a leftard. There where one or two I wasn’t sure of, I’m not counting the terrorist attacks under odumbass. Notice also the mooslim cult has been quite? Could it be they don’t want a target on them? Or are they letting the useful idiots antif^€ take it? If it wasn’t for the the storm that hit my beloved republic of Texas, I believe we are headed for civil war. Think about it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here