As we get closer to the 2020 Presidential elections, the anti-gun proclamations coming from the Democratic Party are getting more and more shrill and hysterical.
But they’re finally getting honest, too, which is a nice change of pace when you’re used to hearing Orwellian doublespeak and outright lies from them.
Think that we’re the ones being hysterical when we say that anti-gunner politicians want to take our guns? You couldn’t be more wrong. Brandon Carter writes,
Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke gave a staunch defense of his gun control plan during Thursday’s Democratic presidential primary debate, saying that as president, he would prioritize mandatory buybacks of assault-style weapons.
Quoting the candidate’s past comment about selling back AR-15s and AK-47s, moderator David Muir asked O’Rourke: “Are you proposing taking away their guns? And how would this work?”
O’Rourke answered, “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.”
Here’s more of what he said:
“I am, if it’s a weapon that was designed to kill people on a battlefield. If the high-impact, high-velocity round, when it hits your body, shreds everything inside of your body, because it was designed to do that, so that you would bleed to death on a battlefield and not be able to get up and kill one of our soldiers.
When we see that being used against children, and in Odessa, I met the mother of a 15-year-old girl who was shot by an AR-15, and that mother watched her bleed to death over the course of an hour because so many other people were shot by that AR-15 in Odessa and Midland, there weren’t enough ambulances to get to them in time. Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore.”
Now, if we could just get O’Rourke to do something about the all of the people who vote Democrat in cities controlled by Democrats (like Chicago and Baltimore) who make up the overwhelming majority of gun crimes in America to give up their guns like O’Rourke wants.
Fat chance of that.
So, O’Rourke, like all of the other anti-gun nutcases blathering about gun violence during this election season, places the blame for gun violence on something that doesn’t do anything by itself (guns) instead of holding individuals accountable for their evil actions.
Ridiculous. But it’s the circus full of clowns that this election is shaping up to be. The campaigns are only going to get worse from here.
Like hell you will Unconditional read the 2# Amendment. Take to US Supreme Court?
The Hell YOU WILL NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Rats have no common sense ( GUNS DON’T KILL PEOPLE). I took an oath when I went to the army and I will live up to that oath.
HELL YES, ALL OF US WHO SERVED IN ANY BRANCH, (AIR FORCE HERE), WILL LIVE UP TO THE OATH WE TOOK. I FOR ONE WILL DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AGAINST “ALL” THAT TRY TO DESTROY IT BOTH DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN. “ALL” LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CONGRESS, SENATE, JUDGES, AND DOJ HAVE TAKEN THE SAME OATH. Why then do they not live up to that oath. IS IT BECAUSE THEY LIED WHEN THEY TOOK IT? OR IS IT BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DESTROY THIS NATION? IN THE CASE OF THE LAST QUESTION THAT WOULD MAKE THEM AN ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! I’m beginning to think all of the democratic party are trying to destroy the United States of America. I hope I am wrong.
well you queer ass democrats, come try and i mean try to get them
and you be up front lets see if you have any balls
The issue I have with this article (randomly by Editor) is the near summation of “Now, if we could just get O’Rourke to do something about the all of the people who vote Democrat in cities controlled by Democrats (like Chicago and Baltimore) who make up the overwhelming majority of gun crimes in America to give up their guns like O’Rourke wants.”
To my eyes … This statement reads like if ‘francis’ was to do something about the idiot democrats in highly governed democrat cities and states with an abundance of gun laws, and even more gun crime, that figuratively ‘WE’ might be willing to give up our AR’s and AK’s.
There is no concession, no middle ground … YOU can have my guns when you pull my cold dead fingers off the triggers. It is my 2nd Amendment right. The only protection for the 1st Amendment, and I will fight to the death for my country and my firearms!
Innocent, responsible gun owners are being blamed for what criminals and mentally unfit people do. NRA members are going through the same garbage. If a nut kills someone with a car you don’t blame the car but rather the driver. You’re trying to buy back cars. Guns don’t kill, people do. Make the penalties for any gun violence crimes especially murder, if witnessed, life in prison or the death penalty, no chance of parole & no trial. End of story. Arm the public with the proper training. Good guys with guns can stop bad guys with guns. 2nd amendment right, the right to bear arms. Shall not be infringed upon. If driving is a privilege, not a right, that privilege can be revoked. So if it’s the 2nd amendment is our right, we the people are entitled to self protection outside the home. However, when our governor is speaking in public he has state police guarding him at the tax payers expense. Why is he entitled but because of his state laws we the people are refused the respect. Wake up all you anti gunners and the government.
Dan everything you say makes sense except one point. You argue that we gun owners deserve our Constitutional rights which we do. I agree about the stiff mandatory sentences for those who kill BUT you added “no trial” That’s a Constitutional right. If the government can take away one – right to trial – they can take away -keep and beat arms-
O’rourke cannot stop the second amendment, peroid.
To the left, it’s not about stopping violence, it’s about power and control. They know their are millions of guns in America and most law abiding citizens will not hand over their guns.
If the left should be elected and control both houses of Congress plus the white house, we will have socialism, which is their goal. It would lead to a revolution, even worse then the civil war. I hope that I’m wrong.
Comments are closed.