No Surprise: NYT Columnist Gets The Issue Backwards


The mainstream media turns a complete blind eye to the issue of guns as a self-defense method. It’s both frustrating and tragic because people who read those articles actually believe that nonsense and, thus, make themselves even more unsafe.

A perfect example is a recent Tweet by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof who wrote (hat tip to here for the source):

The NYC terrorist had a pellet gun and a paintball gun. Good thing that in NYC he couldn’t buy assault rifles, or the toll would be higher.

As usual, Kristof gets the issue completely backwards. The issue isn’t what kind of horrible things that the terrorist could have done if he had had an “assault rifle.” The issue is, what if someone on site had been carrying at that time? How many more people would have survived.


What anti-gunners like Kristof can’t seem to get their head around is that guns, when used in a lawful manner for self-defense save many more lives than they take, and one trained gun owner who had been carrying at the time of the attack could have saved numerous lives.

Of course, the issue comes down to the assumption that the only reason that someone owns a gun is because they want to hurt people, and, so, legal gun owners wouldn’t use a gun to protect innocent lives. Of course, this is ridiculous. By this same logic, the only reason that you would own a knife is to stab people. You wouldn’t ever use it to make dinner, would you?

Now, I don’t want to be too hard on Kristof. Frankly, he appears to be suffering from the same problem that all anti-gunners suffer from: a misunderstanding of the way that the world works. They live in a sheltered world in which someone else deals with violent people for them (or they, at least, believe that to be the case). Legal gun owners live in the real world where, unfortunately, sometimes, people do horrible things to other people, and legal gun owners know that law enforcement can only clean up the mess afterwards. Law enforcement can’t be everywhere all the time to prevent horrible things from happening.

It’s the kind of misguided thinking that Kristof shows in his Tweet that we need to be on guard against. We need to be able to give a rational, calm, reasoned defense of gun ownership so that, when anti-gunners that we meet find that we are rational and kind people, they can become open to actually hearing the truth about guns.



  1. Truth is just – IF – this terrorist wanted to get a firearm he would have in time;
    however he is so ignorant and brain washed that he didn’t want to wait.

    And this can be true of many that are so ignorant as to “recruited” morons.

    Truth is they -“Don’t need no stinkin gun to kill infidel’s.”

    And they don’t even need a drivers license or vehicle = THEY’LL JUST STEAL ONE – and start killing folks right now today.

    So what now – BAN CARS~!!!

    A vehicle is far more effective at “instant” unstoppable mass murder then shooting with a firearm- esp if loaded with gasoline in flimsy 1gallon containers- driving at high speed right thru walls in crowded bldgs.
    * The bigger the vehicle the more capabiity for hellish horror esp if loaded w/gas and diesel as mentioned above(like 100’s of gallons).
    Yes of course it would be suicidal;
    these Islamo’s don’t seem to care~!

    PS- This makes “gun control” of no realistic use as these other far more effective means still remain as well as mass poisoning, biological infestation’s like Pox,Ebola, plague or worse or a dirty bomb spreading radioactive materials= makes a handheld firearm pathetic in comparisonn and a waste of time and violation of personal Rights= majoring in minors.

Comments are closed.