Anti-gunners are routinely hypocritical.
Okay, so not all of them mean to be hypocritical, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are.
For example, they advocate taking gun rights from you, but they will routinely tell you that they don’t want to take your guns. It’s almost like they’re saying “You can keep your guns” with the same meaning as “You can keep your doctor” when we were told that about Obamacare. For many people, “You can keep your doctor” translated into “You will have to find another doctor” when the reality settled in.
Fortunately, for us and for people with the honesty to see, anti-gunners are showing this kind of hypocrisy. Just don’t expect the mainstream media to advertise this. For example, a Democratic candidate supported by Moms Demand Action, Dr. Jennifer Rager-Kay, posted the following on Facebook (hat tip to here for providing the details):
I find it interesting that the largest group of those protesting in the anti-lockdown protest and refusing to wear masks in public as they see it as a violation of their constitutional rights are those against any form of gun regulation. As a conceal carry permitted gun owner. If you refuse to wear a mask and try to come within six feet of my family, I will exercise the same constitutional rights to shoot you.
Now, if you are like most anyone in the anti-gun movement, you might assume that this Facebook post is from a Republican gun control supporter. After all, this lady actually threatened to shoot people. But, as we’ve said, the truth of the situation is the exact opposite.
But, hey, I guess it’s okay if the candidate supported by Moms Demand Action threatens to shoot people because she’s on their side, right? Because, God knows, Moms would freak out if anyone who actually supported gun rights for anyone else threatened to shoot people for any reason at all.
The reality of the situation isn’t that Moms Demand Action. The name of that organization should be Moms Demand Hypocrisy.
So we are conveniently forgetting the fat cheeto who said he’d kill someone in New York and not lose votes?
He didn’t say that he WOULD kill someone, he said that he COULD. There is a difference.
He was making a larger point about the loyalty of his voters, he was NOT threatening anyone.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-fifth-avenue-comment/
As on cue, that childish political party deflects and distracts from the issue discussed and then makes fun of someone’s looks to then go out on another day with their shrill screams about racism. Thank you for proving the hypocrisy point.
she is a CUNT
“Freedom for me but not for thee” is typical for those creeps. It’s all about total power ***over***bthe People and they will stop at nothing to get it.
Same as the NJ governor who says “You aren’t allowed to own a gun, but I can” People Control, not Gun Control is their true agenda!
Comments are closed.