One of the more bizarre ideas that keeps getting pushed by anti-gunners is that stripping Americans of their right to bear arms will somehow mean that certain groups, such as women, will be safer.
Of course, both history and statistics viewed from an unbiased viewpoint show this simply isn’t true. In fact, I’ll go so far as to bluntly say that gun control is anti-woman. Period. End of discussion.
But, in case you think that I’m just some kind of misogynist, I should point out that I’m not the only person who believes this to be true. In fact, a writer going by the name Mom at Arms (what a great pen name!) writes,
Here we are, though… Women’s History Month 2021, and every single gun control law they’re considering are another limitation on the civil cights that women and minorities, not too long ago, acquired. Rather than giving women more education and opportunity to advance in their freedoms, gun control organizations like Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, Everytown for Gun Safety, The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, etc… (who are all funded by rich white men, btw) under the guise of social justice, have worked hard to limit women’s rights even more.
Mom at Arms continues:
GOING BACK TO THE OPENING OF THIS ARTICLE, DURING THE YEAR OF THE WOMAN, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES INCREASED DRAMATICALLY DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC. MANY WOMEN AND MINORITIES BECAME FIRST-TIME FIREARM OWNERS, WITH MORE IN THE MAKING. THESE INCREASES ARE PRETTY COMPELLING EVIDENCE THAT PEOPLE ARE, INDEED, ATTRACTED TO THE IDEA OF PERSONAL PROTECTION DURING TIMES OF CHAOS AND CRISIS.
SO, IF A WOMAN WHO IS IN A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SITUATION (ESPECIALLY A BLACK WOMAN), HAS HAD ENOUGH… AND FINDS SOME COURAGE TO CALL A GUN TOTING, “EXTREMIST” FRIEND FOR SOME ADVICE, AND MAYBE EVEN TO BORROW A FIREARM UNTIL SHE’S SETTLED, SHE NOW HAS TO GO THROUGH EXTENDED METHODS OF VALIDATION, AND WAIT EVEN LONGER, JUST TO ACQUIRE PROTECTION FROM HER ABUSER. ALL OF THAT, IN TURN, WOULD MAKE ANY ABUSER ECSTATIC (BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL HAVE ULTIMATELY LIMITED THE ABILITIES OF HIS VICTIM TO PROTECT HER (OR HIM) SELF. SADLY, THERE ARE WOMEN OUT THERE, LIKE SHANNON WATTS AND HER “MOM ARMY,” (WHO ARE CLOSELY AFFILIATED WITH THE WOMEN’S MARCH), THAT ARE EMPOWERING DOMESTIC ABUSERS, STALKERS, SEXISTS, ETC.. BY MAKING IT HARDER FOR THEIR POTENTIAL VICTIMS TO BECOME EDUCATED ON THEIR RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE. AS THEY CAPITALIZE OFF OF TRAGEDIES INVOLVING FIREARMS TO MAINTAIN THEIR STATUS QUOS AND POWER, THESE GROUPS OF ELITIST WOMEN, SLOWLY ETCH AWAY EVERY ADVANCEMENT IN THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN AMERICA.
My entire argument here, which is supported by Mom at Arms, is not hard to understand. The argument is this: when someone takes away a woman’s ability to protect herself, it is an anti-woman position. Thus, because guns are one of (maybe the) most effective equalizer between an aggressor and a woman, stripping gun rights from people strips the ability of many women to be able to defend themselves from harm.
The conclusion is clear: gun control is anti-woman.
There is no such thing as gun control, or gun rights, any more than there is tricycle control, or tricycle rights.
There is law abiding citizen control, law abiding citizen woman control, and anti Constitution control. As well as attempted communist control of non elites, non leftists, and non democrats.
I beg to differ. Gun control is the “Democrat” ideal which they take for granted to create more laws against the law abiding citizen to make them criminals as well. Be it, women, men, or anyone responsible enough to know when/when not to use in defense.
Example; “infringe” has several different definitions and meanings. Yet, they took one word and used it to slowly alter the word “infringed” and slowly and methodically take ones “right to keep and bear arms.” The one word in “omit.”
Infringe; trespass, omit, inhibit, prohibit, etc etc.
You can look in a thesaurus, dictionary, and law dictionary to find all meanings and definitions of the word infringed. They have altered it in a way to take away your rights!
This is why I cannot understand the SCOTUS’ reluctance to take on the issue of government ‘gun control’! On the face of the 2nd Amendment, just about EVERYTHING the government has done is unConstitutional! I can’t fathom why they prefer to sit on their ‘laurels’! Are they all asleep? From the ages of some, this man be the reason!
What a very “common sense” article! I say “common sense” as that is what the totalitarian leftist Democrats call unconstitutional gun control. Gun control is at its very foundation discriminatory. Every human being has a basic right to self protection and the defend their family, friend, property and country. That is why the right to bare arms is the only Constitutionally guaranteed right to include these powerful words “shall not be infringed”! Taxes and fees beyond general sales tax are an infringement. Waiting periods are an infringement especially in trying times. Officials at any level deciding who can get a license to own or carry a firearm is an infringement. Driving a car is a privilege and can require a license while the right to bare arms is a right and the Constitution is everyone’s license. Cars are responsible for many more deaths and injuries than legally owned guns, far more. So common sense, as well as every study ever done on guns and crime tells us that unconstitutional gum laws fly in the face of “common sense” and are an abuse of power.
Restrictions on gun possession coupled with defunding the police are acts of contempt towards normal citizens. It plainly states ” we don’t care about you”. And they clearly don’t.
I assume that the elites are working with the drug dealers, not
the public.
Gun control HAS ALWAYS BEEN RACIST , Indigenous people ( Indians ) CANNOT OWN GUNS , Jew’s CANNOT OWN GUNS , Black’s CANNOT OWN GUNS …
Now its Law Abiding people CANNOT OWN GUNS and if you think that will stop anything think about this HOW DO DRUGS GET INTO THIS COUNTRY ??? A new smuggling industry is born …
Democrats protect drug abuse and “addictions violence”… blame it on inanimate objects…
Comments are closed.